|
sometimes i think it is very cruel that people are resiting and they wanted to graduate and the lecture do not want/intend to help the students.
mayb they left only this paper to graduated?
one of my friend have not failed the internal exam before,
and this semester he failed the final three paper.
and he have to sit for all five paper....
including external acca 2 option paper and
internal resit 3 core paper.
i think it would be a big burden to them since they are given little time to prepare for the subject.
i think lectures do want to help us pass.
but i do not understand why some lecture refuse to do so?
erm... to protect their good name?
or they do not want to be liable about the things they say?
i feel weird sometimes.....
cos when a lecture give guidance/hints before the exam...
after the exam there would be a lot of noice complaining about the lecture giving tips to the student....
aren't giving tips to the student one of the motif before exam?
then... why after exam already... the students want to complaint about the lecture giving tips to them?
lecture are just normal human being...
they also wanna protect their reputation and they wanted to secure their job.
since they already being kind hearted to give tips,
why dont you just listen,
and whether you wanted to accept or not...
it's all up to you.
and they are also not liable to the accuracy of the tips.
since you are liable for your own behaviour.
if you knoe the tips,
just share it with your friends,
and keep quiet after that lur...
erm... i do really pity....
because lecture do really suffer ethical dialema since they already setting the question and they have to spread something out to ensure that most of the student passed the exam.
mayb they left only this paper to graduated?
one of my friend have not failed the internal exam before,
and this semester he failed the final three paper.
and he have to sit for all five paper....
including external acca 2 option paper and
internal resit 3 core paper.
i think it would be a big burden to them since they are given little time to prepare for the subject.
i think lectures do want to help us pass.
but i do not understand why some lecture refuse to do so?
erm... to protect their good name?
or they do not want to be liable about the things they say?
i feel weird sometimes.....
cos when a lecture give guidance/hints before the exam...
after the exam there would be a lot of noice complaining about the lecture giving tips to the student....
aren't giving tips to the student one of the motif before exam?
then... why after exam already... the students want to complaint about the lecture giving tips to them?
lecture are just normal human being...
they also wanna protect their reputation and they wanted to secure their job.
since they already being kind hearted to give tips,
why dont you just listen,
and whether you wanted to accept or not...
it's all up to you.
and they are also not liable to the accuracy of the tips.
since you are liable for your own behaviour.
if you knoe the tips,
just share it with your friends,
and keep quiet after that lur...
erm... i do really pity....
because lecture do really suffer ethical dialema since they already setting the question and they have to spread something out to ensure that most of the student passed the exam.
Post a Comment